|March 1, 2014 at 2:59 am #213|
Mt.Gox is gone. The one-time biggest Bitcoin exchange closed its doors this week and filed for bankruptcy this morning. Questions about the future of Bitcoin have once again been up-leveled to the headlines of nearly every major media outlet.
Over the past few weeks, we’ve seen a string of issues in the Bitcoin space, from the transaction malleability bug that ultimately closed Mt.Gox’s doors to a corresponding distributed denial of service (DDoS) attack that delayed transfers on multiple exchanges and services. These attacks, along with recent phishing scams and money-laundering arrests, have cast doubt on the Bitcoin space and caused consumer panic — which is fair.
But what hasn’t been communicated well is how those who are truly invested in the future of Bitcoin remain totally confident, because with every attack, breach, and arrest, Bitcoin is getting stronger and proving to consumers and businesses it is not going away.
Here is what is not being said about Bitcoin that should be.
Open networks keep growing even if individual participants fail.
It is critical to understand just how different an open payment network is from the proprietary payment networks that exist today. To illustrate this differently, let’s look at another open protocol: email.
Bad actors are quickly weeded out of open networks because consumers have choice — the choice of many new entrants coming on the market to vie for their business.
If an individual email provider has a security breach, or loses the integrity of its customers, this doesn’t reflect on the concept of email generally — it merely reflects on the integrity of the individual provider. Further, the beauty of open networks is that they provide a low barrier to entry for competing services to come in and vie for your business as a consumer. Bad actors are quickly weeded out of open networks because consumers have choice — the choice of many new entrants coming on the market to vie for their business. Open networks do a great job of keeping incumbent companies honest, because if they make a mistake and lose their customers’ trust, their customers will be gone in a flash.
An open payment network is a game changer.
Unlike Bitcoin or email, our financial institutions and payment systems today are proprietary. This limits the ability for consumers to easily switch between payment providers and creates less competition for services. If the provider of a proprietary payment network isn’t serving its customers’ needs, where else will their customers turn? There is only one company you can use to access a proprietary payment network — the company that owns it. This higher switching cost has a few side effects: less competition in the market, higher fees, limited geographic reach of any individual network, and less innovation around things like speed of transactions.
Clearly open networks offer a number of benefits, so why hadn’t an open payment network existed previously? Until recently, many people thought it wasn’t possible to build a payment system on an open network. The core issue was around preventing duplicate spending without using a central company to verify each transaction. Nothing prevents you from sending duplicate emails multiple times, for example, if you wanted to do this.
Bitcoin will take time to mature as the protocol is tested and strained with new types of attacks.
New technologies take time to mature.
Just like email, there are growing pains for any new technology. Spam, phishing, and hacking have “attacked” email for two decades, but with each new breach comes the ability to make the protocol stronger, to innovate (as Google has with machine learning to detect and prevent spam email). These technologies weren’t developed overnight, or even conceived when email was created. Yet they were key to making email stable and reliable in people’s minds, until it became a part of their everyday life.
In the same way, Bitcoin will take time to mature as the protocol is tested and strained with new types of attacks. Most of the obvious attacks were considered in the original Bitcoin paper, and have been patched in the early years of Bitcoin development. More complex attacks, such as the “transaction malleability” issue we saw just a few weeks ago, can still have a moderate impact, affecting a limited set of service providers.
Within the coming years, disrupting the Bitcoin network will become increasingly more difficult as Bitcoin wallet software and the protocol become more mature and resilient. Like the spam filters developed on top of email, the best Bitcoin services providers will develop the best software to iron out any details the Bitcoin protocol has still left open to abuse.
All new technologies take time to mature and work the details out. When trying to predict the future, you should never look at the state of a technology today, but the trend of how it is growing or maturing over time.
Bitcoin is gaining traction with merchants.
The No. 1 reason to have confidence in Bitcoin despite all of the recent turbulence is incredible demand among businesses to accept Bitcoin (thus giving consumers more territory to spend them).
When trying to predict the future, you should never look at the state of a technology today, but the trend of how it is growing or maturing over time.
Just in the past few months, sites like Mint.com, Bing, and point of sales software like Revel Systems (used in many retail outlets across the United States) have also integrated Bitcoin payments.
Around San Francisco, New York City and other major cities across the globe, Bitcoin acceptance is rapidly moving into brick-and-mortar shops, restaurants and even professional businesses like dentists and law firms. Consumers are paying with a quick scan of a QR code or using technologies like NFC and Bluetooth low energy. Merchants are enjoying instant transactions at lower fees, and this momentum will only accelerate in 2014 – with thousands more companies beginning to accept Bitcoin.
Bitcoin companies will be audited in old and new ways.
If there is one positive takeaway from the collapse of Mt.Gox it is the willingness of a new generation of Bitcoin companies to work together to ensure the future of Bitcoin and the security of customer funds. Going forward, the security and solvency of Bitcoin companies will be verified in several ways. First, through the traditional audit industry (the big four accounting firms), as they’ve done for many industries. Second, through novel techniques using cryptography to prove ownership of funds with Bitcoin’s public blockchain ledger.
A new wave of Bitcoin companies – Coinbase, Bitstamp.net, Kraken, BTC China, Blockchain.info, Circle, The Bitcoin Foundation and more – represent trustworthy and responsible companies and groups involved in Bitcoin that are proactive about engaging on regulation and policy and independently auditing and testing security measures to ensure consumer confidence.
Mt.Gox is in no way the end of Bitcoin — quite the opposite, in fact. Just as the closing of Silk Road in 2013 led to the biggest boost in value of the Bitcoin to date, weeding out immature companies and bad actors is paving the way for a legitimate Bitcoin marketplace. While it may be coincidence that during the Mt.Gox debacle, Coinbase hit 1 million consumer wallets, it is also representative of what legitimate Bitcoin companies have known through the big ups and the low lows – Bitcoin is fundamentally the best payment system for the Internet era.
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.